<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Legal Coffee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.legalcoffee.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.legalcoffee.org</link>
	<description>Reinventing Lawyers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 03:47:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Steinbeck Was Talking EQ Before There Was An EQ</title>
		<link>http://www.legalcoffee.org/2012/02/15/steinbeck-was-talking-eq-before-there-was-an-eq/</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalcoffee.org/2012/02/15/steinbeck-was-talking-eq-before-there-was-an-eq/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 21:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lawkop</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emotional intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social intelligence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalcoffee.org/?p=3099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Empathy is key part of emotional intelligence.  What do you think Steinbeck means when he writes:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">In every bit of honest writing in the world … there is a base theme. Try to understand men, if you understand&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalcoffee.org/2012/02/15/steinbeck-was-talking-eq-before-there-was-an-eq/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why The SOPA Debate Engaged So Many</title>
		<link>http://www.legalcoffee.org/2012/02/07/why-the-sopa-debate-engaged-so-many/</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalcoffee.org/2012/02/07/why-the-sopa-debate-engaged-so-many/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lawkop</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOPA for Lawyers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalcoffee.org/?p=3125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Now that that dust is clearing from the first round of the SOPA debate, let’s look back and address why so many people told Congress “No.” I believe Clay Sharkey gets is right:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ted.com/talks/defend_our_freedom_to_share_or_why_sopa_is_a_bad_idea.html">SOPA Debate</a></p>
<div class="shr-publisher-3125"></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalcoffee.org/2012/02/07/why-the-sopa-debate-engaged-so-many/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jurors Make Their Own Closing Arguments</title>
		<link>http://www.legalcoffee.org/2012/01/27/jurors-make-their-own-closing-arguments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalcoffee.org/2012/01/27/jurors-make-their-own-closing-arguments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 22:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lawkop</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Storytelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storytelling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalcoffee.org/?p=2854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Narratives create narratives. When you hear a story, it pulls up frames from other narratives you have previously adopted. A personalized story telling process occurs in your mind. You take the new story and mold it with your preexisting deep&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalcoffee.org/2012/01/27/jurors-make-their-own-closing-arguments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Touch of Bias</title>
		<link>http://www.legalcoffee.org/2012/01/26/2143/</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalcoffee.org/2012/01/26/2143/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lawkop</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Storytelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorney cartoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[framing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[framing arguments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Happy Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[happy lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how to start a law firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawyer cartoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalcoffee.org/?p=2143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Ever feel like you are playing a rigged game?</p>
<div class="shr-publisher-2143"></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalcoffee.org/2012/01/26/2143/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Difference Between a Narrative and a Story</title>
		<link>http://www.legalcoffee.org/2012/01/23/2815/</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalcoffee.org/2012/01/23/2815/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lawkop</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Storytelling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalcoffee.org/?p=2815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The difference between a narrative and a story is a debatable. Many people use the terms synonymously. Here is my view of the difference. A simple story retells events (real or fictional). A narrative is more complex and narcissistic. A&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalcoffee.org/2012/01/23/2815/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whose Job is It?</title>
		<link>http://www.legalcoffee.org/2012/01/20/whose-job-is-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalcoffee.org/2012/01/20/whose-job-is-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lawkop</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Happy Lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Happy Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[happy lawyers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalcoffee.org/?p=3060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;s Job is it to make yourself happy? Here are few hints.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">It&#8217;s not your significant others.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">It is not your children.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">It&#8217;s not your boss.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">It&#8217;s not your clients.</p>
<p style="padding-left:<p>&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalcoffee.org/2012/01/20/whose-job-is-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One Post &amp; Three Blogs</title>
		<link>http://www.legalcoffee.org/2012/01/19/one-post-three-blogs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalcoffee.org/2012/01/19/one-post-three-blogs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lawkop</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duplicate Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalcoffee.org/?p=3139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I was recently able to debunk a myth I heard about Google&#8217;s duplicate content penalty. I am happy to report, under certain circumstances, you can put portions of one post on more than one blog without a penalty from Google.&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalcoffee.org/2012/01/19/one-post-three-blogs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Real Fight</title>
		<link>http://www.legalcoffee.org/2012/01/18/the-real-fight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalcoffee.org/2012/01/18/the-real-fight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lawkop</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Storytelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorney cartoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[framing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[framing arguments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how to be a lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawyer cartoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal coffee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legalcoffee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solo lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storytelling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalcoffee.org/?p=2174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What is the real fight about in a jury trial? Jurors vote their morality. That is, their moral view of justice. We make the choice that makes us feel better about our world. We are given information and then we&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalcoffee.org/2012/01/18/the-real-fight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oxygen and Cash</title>
		<link>http://www.legalcoffee.org/2012/01/17/net-cash-flow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalcoffee.org/2012/01/17/net-cash-flow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lawkop</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lawyers and Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[building a law firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how to start a law firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law practice management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyers and money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Cash Flow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rainmaking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solo lawyers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalcoffee.org/?p=3031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Two simple realities:</p>
<ol>
<li>For you body – No oxygen, No life.</li>
<li>For your firm. No cash, No life.</li>
</ol>
<p>The most overlooked, but most important metric for your firm is: &#8220;<span style="color: #000080;"><em><strong><span class="fontsforweb_fontid_802"><span class="fontsforweb_fontid_804">Net Cash Flow</span></span></strong></em></span>.&#8221; In order to understand&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalcoffee.org/2012/01/17/net-cash-flow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Equation of a Decision</title>
		<link>http://www.legalcoffee.org/2012/01/16/the-wisdom-of-arnold-palmer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.legalcoffee.org/2012/01/16/the-wisdom-of-arnold-palmer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lawkop</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Storytelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emotional intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mindfulness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social intelligence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.legalcoffee.org/2011/07/05/the-wisdom-of-arnold-palmer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.legalcoffee.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/R-+-E-D.png"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-2934" title="R + E = D" src="http://www.legalcoffee.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/R-+-E-D-300x58.png" alt="" width="300" height="58" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Every decision <strong>(D)</strong> you make combines two different things. The rational part of your brain <strong>(R)</strong> is one part of the equation and the emotional part <strong>(E) </strong>is the other half. Your decisions are based on&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.legalcoffee.org/2012/01/16/the-wisdom-of-arnold-palmer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

